Semaglutide × Polaris Peptides — Lab Test, May 2025
Trust Pointe Analytics publishes a public verification portal. Any test attributed to this lab can be looked up and confirmed directly with the lab — so this result doesn't rest on our review alone.
This certificate carries no lookup code.
Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 2 mg · Lab measured 2.487 mg
124% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 622 mcg using the measured mass, against 500 mcg on the label — 24% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
Independent HPLC purity analysis of Semaglutide from Polaris Peptides, performed by Trust Pointe Analytics on May 23, 2025. Reported purity: 99.886%. Net content: 2.487 mg against 2 mg labeled (124% of label). Tested content exceeds the labeled amount by 24%. Batch POL-S2-5. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of Semaglutide from Polaris Peptides
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POL-S10-14 | 3 Apr 2026 | Trust Pointe Analytics | 99.48% | 126% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| POL-S5-8 | 12 Aug 2025 | Trust Pointe Analytics | 99.528% | 120% | Unverified |
| POL-S10-11 | 8 Jul 2025 | Chromate | 99.866% | 126% | Unverified |
| POL-S10-7 | 11 Nov 2024 | Janoshik Labs | 99.57% | 109% | Unverified |
| POL-S2-4 | 7 Aug 2024 | Janoshik Labs | 98.267% | 104% | Unverified |
| POL-S5-1 | 29 Feb 2024 | Janoshik Labs | 99.56% | 101% | Unverified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion