TB-500 × mspeptides.com — Lab Test, February 2026
COA 2602040330 matches freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
Mole2602040330Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 5 mg · Lab measured 5.34 mg
107% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 1.3 mg using the measured mass, against 1.3 mg on the label — 7% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | 2602040330 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 20 Jul 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of TB-500 from mspeptides.com, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on February 8, 2026. Reported purity: 99.05%. Net content: 5.34 mg against 5 mg labeled (107% of label). Batch R260122-TB5-W001. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of TB-500 from mspeptides.com
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R260304-TB10-W001 | 11 Mar 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.583% | 129% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| R251022-TFR-Q001 | 4 Nov 2025 | Janoshik Labs | 99.89% | 116% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| R250224-TB5-N001 | 10 Mar 2025 | MZ Biolabs | 99.1% | — | Lab has no portal |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion