GHK-Cu × mspeptides.com — Lab Test, January 2026
COA 2601080248 matches freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
Mole2601080248Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 100 mg · Lab measured 113.07 mg
113% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 28.3 mg using the measured mass, against 25 mg on the label — 13% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | 2601080248 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 20 Jul 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of GHK-Cu from mspeptides.com, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on January 11, 2026. Reported purity: 99.933%. Net content: 113.07 mg against 100 mg labeled (113% of label). Tested content exceeds the labeled amount by 13%. Batch R260105-GCU-N001. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of GHK-Cu from mspeptides.com
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R260311-GCU-N001 | 18 Mar 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.362% | 119% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| R251201-GCU-N001 | 12 Dec 2025 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.742% | 108% | ✓ Lab-verified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion