✓ Purity · pass✓ Lab-verifiedBatch · Grey CapShop-provided sample
CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin × Pep Club USA — lab test, June 2026
Tested · submitted by Peptigrity Team Member 02PEPTIGRITY TEAM
Sample source: shop-provided. The shop chose and sent this vial. The Trust Score counts it like any other published test; who sourced the vial is shown so you can weigh it yourself.How we weigh evidence →
HPLC Purity
99.82%
✓ Excellent purity only
Counts toward Pep Club USA's Trust Score until 21 Jun 2028
Independently confirmed on the lab’s portal✓ Extra check
COA 2606180235 matches Freedom Diagnostics's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
Lookup code
Pepc2606180235Look it up on Freedom Diagnostics ↗Checked Jun 21, 2026
Test results
4 data points
Purity
99.82%
Endotoxins
Not tested
Sterility
Not on file
Heavy metals
Not tested
Stated qty
Not provided
Tested qty
Not provided
Batch / Lot
Grey Cap
COA number
2606180235
Container
White Lyophilized Powder / Grey Cap
Tested by
Freedom DiagnosticsView profile →
Not on file for this certificate: endotoxins, sterility and heavy metals. A purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Verification trail
| Report number | 2606180235 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 31 Jul 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | Freedom Diagnostics's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin from Pep Club USA, performed by Freedom Diagnostics on June 21, 2026. Reported purity: 99.82%. Batch Grey Cap. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Original document
Issued by Freedom Diagnostics · Jun 21, 2026 · Batch Grey Cap
♡ Likes · 0
No comments yet. Sign in to discuss this test →
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion