5-Amino-1MQ × ezpeps.com — Lab Test, January 2026
COA 2601130199 matches freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
ezPe2601130199Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 10 mg · Lab measured 12.48 mg
125% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 3.1 mg using the measured mass, against 2.5 mg on the label — 25% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | 2601130199 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 24 Jul 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of 5-Amino-1MQ from ezpeps.com, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on January 15, 2026. Reported purity: 99.708%. Net content: 12.48 mg against 10 mg labeled (125% of label). Tested content exceeds the labeled amount by 25%. Batch 25-U12-VBT/51Q101218. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of 5-Amino-1MQ from ezpeps.com
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26-M4-50AM / 5AM500401 | 26 May 2026 | ILS Laboratories | 99.78% | 104% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| 26-U2-RPT / 51Q100201 | 27 Apr 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.93% | 132% | ✓ Lab-verified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion