CJC-1295 with DAC × Pure Health Peptides — Lab Test, November 2025
BioRegen publishes a public verification portal. Any test attributed to this lab can be looked up and confirmed directly with the lab — so this result doesn't rest on our review alone. Click 'Verify' (top right), then enter COA Number + Validation Key from the COA
This certificate carries no lookup code.
Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 10 mg · Lab measured 8.92 mg
89% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 2.2 mg using the measured mass, against 2.5 mg on the label — 11% less.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
Independent HPLC purity analysis of CJC-1295 DAC from purehealthpeptides.com, performed by BioRegen on November 1, 2025. Reported purity: 99.85%. Net content: 8.92 mg against 10 mg labeled (89% of label). Tested content is 11% below the labeled amount. Batch TUY-101025. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of CJC-1295 with DAC from purehealthpeptides.com
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUY-030926 | 11 Apr 2026 | Ethos Analytics | 99% | 103% | Lab has no portal |
| TUY-022626 | 26 Mar 2026 | Bioviridian | 99.7% | 58% | Unverified |
| TUY-011526 | 22 Jan 2026 | Ethos Analytics | 99% | 101% | Lab has no portal |
| TUY-101025 | 1 Nov 2025 | BioRegen | 99.94% | 98% | Unverified |
| TUY-031415 | 27 May 2025 | BioRegen | 99.76% | 998% | Unverified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion