TB-500 × ezpeps.com — Lab Test, June 2026
COA COA-2026-VEJ3ZJ / ACC-2026-4139 matches ILS Laboratories's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
6YYYU5R7Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 10 mg · Lab measured 10.67 mg
107% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 2.7 mg using the measured mass, against 2.5 mg on the label — 7% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | COA-2026-VEJ3ZJ / ACC-2026-4139 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 24 Jul 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | ILS Laboratories's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of TB-500 from ezpeps.com, performed by ILS Laboratories on June 9, 2026. Reported purity: 99.81%. Net content: 10.67 mg against 10 mg labeled (107% of label). Batch 26-M5-10TB / BT10050126-1. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of TB-500 from ezpeps.com
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26-M5-10TB / BT10050126-1 | 9 Jun 2026 | ILS Laboratories | 99.81% | 107% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| 26-U2-RRT/TB4100226 | 15 Mar 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.174% | 116% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| TB4100918 | 3 Oct 2025 | Janoshik Labs | 99.82% | 114% | ✓ Lab-verified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion